Toilet War
On Friday in Sofia a new book by the Bulgarian journalist Zhivko Ginchec was
released, called "Toilet War". The subtitle is "A chess drama
in 13 acts". The first edition has been printed in 20,000 copies. We have
not yet managed to procure a copy, but associates are purchasing some in Bulgaria
and have promised to review the contents for us. As soon as we have this information
we will bring it to you on our news pages.
Toilet War – A Chess Drama in 13 Acts, by Zhivko Ginchev (inset right)
The German journalist Dagobert
Kohlmeyer reports that the book describes the twelve games between Kramnik
and Topalov in Elista, and the tiebreak in the end, but with very little actual
chess content (just the notation of the games are included). The author
is mainly concerned with the ominous circumstances of the duel and the intense
conflict between the protagonists. Kohlmeyer: "The date of public release
of this book was not a coincidence. It happened one day before the explosive
game between Topalov and Kramnik at the Wijk aan Zee tournament. So the Bulgarians
played their next move outside the chessboard." Our associates in Bulgaria
tell us that the highlight of the book is a graphic description and pictures
of computer cables that were allegedly found in the ceiling of Kramnik's rest
room at the tournament venue in Elista.
The back cover of the book states: "Chess has the reputation of being
a quiet game, in which there are no ankle injuries or bruised elbows. But in
the godforsaken town of Elista we hear the artillary volleys of a toilet war."
Kramnik's repeated visits to the toilet are characterised by the author as "biotechnological
poison" that Kramnik used against Topalov.
Veseling Topalov promoting the book in Wijk aan Zee
Kohlmeyer, who spoke with Danailov and Topalov in Wijk aan Zee, reports that
Topalov's manager was seeking to play down the importance of an
interview that Topalov gave the Spanish newspaper ABC. "It was an idiot,
some local journalist who got the chance for the first time in his life to publish
a big story. Veselin did not say the things that appeared in the interview in
that form. The writer did not know how to conduct an interview. And he did not
have the text authorised by his interview partner."
Kramnik's manager Carsten Hensel, who has filed a complaint with the FIDE Ethics
Committee because of the accusations raised in the interview, said that the
journalist had a tape recording of the interview, proving that the insulting
and accusatory comments were actualy made by Topalov. Kohlmeyer: "The war
between the two sides continues."
Reaction to the article in the Süddeutsche Zeitung
We reported yesterday
that the Saturday issue of the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung had
carried an article by one of their regular contributors on observations he had
made at the tournament in Wijk aan Zee. The implication of the report was that
Topalov was receiving external assistance. To this article the semi-official
web site www.veselintopalov.com
has replied as follows:
It is obvious that some people just cannot accept the fact that the first
player in the Elo list is not the one that played against Fritz. They also
cannot accept the facts exposed in the toiletgate book published by Grain
Advertising and Zhivko Ginchev. In a desperate attempt to diminish Topalov’s
success, another media attack has been launched.
It is a shameful act by Chessbase and German media against Veselin Topalov.
The text inside is not even worth commenting. But it brings high suspicions
that somebody is not comfortable that the N1 player keeps on proving that
he is the best.
The media attack also comes as a response to a carefully collected picture
and evidence material by Zhivko Ginchev. He published his book just a few
days ago and exposes a significant number of facts and inside stories that
bother personal interests. However, the exact dates, photos, and words in
Ginchev’s book “The toilet war” have stable grounds, while
the shameful attack against Topalov has no single fact to support it.
Well, there is something that deserves a comment. The article says, “Neither
Danailov nor Topalov were available for comment during the past week, in spite
of repeated attempts to contact them.” Is this a joke? Are we supposed
to laugh? Topalov is the man that gave most press conferences, talked to many
people from the audience, gave interviews, participated in radio broadcasts.
The whole team of veselintopalov.net, together with the many fans that sent
emails of support, expresses their worries about the media attacks that have
become more than frequent. Veselin Topalov is a man that works for chess,
it’s development, and promotion. If you people, that write articles
with no facts or credible arguments, do not care about the future development
of chess and the ones that work for it’s promotion, you should at least
not hinder that process.
We hardly need to stress that the report by Martin Breutigam was not initiated
or published by ChessBase. It was the work of a major independent newspaper
with which ChessBase has no affiliation or editorial influence. We would also
like to mention that over the past year and a quarter (since the World Championship
in San Luis) we have received a number of letters and articles on the same subject,
mainly from players and grandmasters, but did not publish any of these, since
in each case no direct evidence was provided. In the current case we only reported
that a major newspaper had published a big (and potentially scandalous) chess
story, a fact that we deemed newsworthy.
The Veselin Topalov web site further reports that there will be no rematch
Topalov vs Kramnik:
“There is no possibility the match Topalov Kramnik to take place,”
said Kirsan Ilymzhinov in the FIDE presidential board meeting in Antalia for
radio Mayak. This time the FIDE president spoke directly and explained that
the match cannot take place because it has to take place six months before
the tournament in Mexico 2007. Ilymzhinov explained, “In order to have
a match for the title it has to start no later than February 11. This is impossible.”
