Dear All,
I was personally present in Kazan during the Candidates Tournament. These are
my conclusions:
The current KO system (short matches) for the Candidates tournament is negative
for chess. The reasons are as follows:
-
So far we have 27 draws out of 29 games in classical chess, about 95% (!!).
Many of these draws were very short – 12,15,18 etc. moves. Even in
rapid games we have draws in 8 (!!!) moves. This is shame and disaster for
the image of chess and FIDE. The question is, why didn’t the WCOC
introduce the Sofia Rules on time?
-
Some of the players were making short draws on purpose, in order to decide
matches in rapid chess or blitz. But the point is that if we have WCC in
classical chess, why should we decide the matches in blitz? Knowing very
well from the past experience that the KO system leads to and tempts with
that, why does the WCOC recommend it?
-
The PR results of Kazan are very poor. With probably small exception of
Russia, there doesn’t appear any interest from international Press
for this event. This also hurts chess and FIDE.
Conclusion: The WCOC who is responsible for this system failed, and should
resign immediately. The FIDE PB should appoint new WCOC on next meeting in Al
Ain in order to avoid before mentioned mishaps and to improve the situation
in the future.
Best regards,
Silvio Danailov, President of ECU
Friday, May 27, 2011
Official response by FIDE to ECU President
Dear all,
With great surprise we read the announcement of Mr Silvio Danailov on 25 May,
accusing the members of the FIDE World Championship Committee as being responsible
for the high percentage of ...draws(!) in Kazan. A non-chess reader would really
wonder whether the members of the World Championship Committee were the ones
playing in the Candidates Matches. Once more Mr Danailov shows no respect to
the top players, we hope under his competitive capacity of a player's manager
and not that of ECU President.
If it wasn't for Mr Danailov 's dual role as President of ECU and manager
of top players, no reply would have been necessary to this incredible announcement,
as its content speaks by itself for the poor quality of his arguments. Everybody
in professional chess knows very well that if two grandmasters desire during
the game to draw it, there is no way to force them not to. FIDE has valuated
various ideas in the past (for example the "no draw offer before move 30"
or the so called "Sofia rule") but the truth is that applying such
regulations to a World Championship Cycle needs further input from the top players
and their national federations. Mr. Danailov should understand that chess players
cannot be whipped to dance to his tune, especially those fighting for the World
Championship title.
FIDE is in the process of conducting discussions for future improvements on
the format of the cycle and the announcement of Mr Danailov came immediately
after receiving such a questionnaire (in his capacity
as Veselin Topalov's manager) from FIDE WCOC member Emil Sutovsky. A couple
of weeks ago Mr Danailov also announced his intention to run for FIDE President
in 2014. Seeing the opportunity to promote his own political agenda, Mr Danailov
abused his position as ECU President and FIDE's desire for feedback from its
top players, to attack through his reply whom he views as "political opponents",
instead of participating constructively in the on-going dialogue for the future
World Championship cycles. Mr Danailov has not understood yet that he has been
elected to the position of ECU President, with a monthly salary accompanying
it, in order to serve all European chess players and not only his future political
ambitions in FIDE.
We therefore ask Mr Danailov to participate in the dialogue initiated by the
World Championship Committee in a productive manner as nobody else is sharing
his rush to connect everything with the FIDE elections in 2014. We also confirm
once more that the interests of all top players are protected by FIDE, of course
including those of Veselin Topalov.
Best regards,
Georgios Makropoulos
FIDE Deputy President & WCOC Chairman
The questionnaire sent by GM Emil Sutovsky to the
twenty top-rated players:
Dear colleagues,
On behalf of the World Championship and Olympiads committee ( WCOC ), I'd
like to ask your opinion regarding the format of the future World Championship
Cycles.
As we all know, opinions differ, and it is not easy to find a solution that
will satisfy all the leading players. However, we shall try to find a system
which will be both professional and realistic. In this regard, I would appreciate
hearing your thoughts before the topic is discussed on the next WCOC meeting
in the beginning of June and important decisions are taken.
As the topic is too complex, I've prepared several questions. It would be
nice to have your answers, but of course, you are most welcomed to present your
vision as a separate letter. The questions:
-
What is more suitable system for Candidates – matches or double
round robin?
-
If the match system is used, what format would you prefer (4+4+6, like
in Kazan, 6+6+6, other...) Do you have positive/negative remarks about the
format used in Kazan?
-
Should the World Champion's privilege stay intact or should the World
Champion join the Candidates in the future cycles?
- Do you think FIDE should preserve two-year cycle or consider switching
to a yearly Championship?
I would appreciate having your response before May 30, so that it can be presented
on the WCOC meeting.
Best regards,
Emil Sutovsky
